|
If you stick with the river and follow the channel from the mouth of the chute to the confluence where it re-joins the river, you've traveled about 3.4 miles. If you decide to take the chute, an "optimal" path takes you about 2.2 miles if you start and end from identical points.
Let's say you average 8mph on the river. So the river path will take you 25.5 minutes. Yes, that's all, meaning that's the maximum possible time you can save at 8mph (if you have a teleporter). Taking the chute at 8mph, on the other hand, will take you 16.5 minutes. You may think that means you can save 9 minutes by taking the chute.
However...
You have to survive the waterfall and stay upright while keeping your supplies (such as the light you'll be using if you're near the head of the pack) inside of your boat. You really don't want to lose your light in the Bottoms.
You have to find a "channel" that is deep enough to take you continuously through the chute. The chute isn't managed like the river is, so there's no guarantee of a channel. On the contrary, you're likely to find sandbars, mud, overturned trees, logjams, boulders, or whatever other hazards might find their way into the chute. And Asian carp love low, shallow, slow-moving water.
In the chute, you have to maintain 8mph in dead water (i.e., there's no Missouri River current in the chute, it flows more slowly than the river). If it costs you even 1mph to take the chute, it will cost you much of your advantage... It's 19 minutes to get through it at 7mph, so your 9-minute advantage has been cut to 6.5 minutes.
In order to save 15 minutes going equal speeds through either route, you'd have to average 4.8mph, yielding 42.5 minutes the "slow" way and 27.5 minutes the "fast" way - Which in today's river means you'd have to paddle upstream to go that slow in the channel.
If you get stuck, getting out of your boat will land you in a swampy marsh that will surely suck away any advantage you may gain. And if your boat is disabled by any of the hazards, you should bank on NO ONE finding you. In fact, one of the people who got stuck couldn't even figure out what direction to go to get out.
If anyone tells you that they've saved a significant amount of time by taking the chute, I would be willing to bet they're exaggerating. Regardless, I personally don't think the risks are worth it. If you're one of the top 5% boats in your division, you're not saving time by "shooting the chute". You can save just as much time by reducing each checkpoint by about 60 seconds. It may be an interesting weekend adventure, but probably not something to try if you're near the lead.
Hope that helps...
IP Logged
|